Site icon Pulsivic

China’s 3 Biggest Fears Exposed – Why Is It Silent on Pakistan’s Terror?

China s 3 Biggest Fears Exposed Why Is It Silent on Pakist 20250630105557680067

China’s Dirty Little Secret: Why It Turns a Blind Eye to Pakistan’s Terror Problem

The Elephant in the Room

You know what’s funny? China loves to play the counter-terrorism hero on the global stage. But here’s the thing—while they’re busy locking up Uyghur Muslims by the millions in Xinjiang, they’re oddly quiet about Pakistan’s open support for terrorist groups. I mean, come on. You can’t have it both ways. And that’s exactly what this whole mess reveals—China’s playing a geopolitical game where principles take a backseat to cold, hard strategy.

1. The Hypocrisy That’s Hard to Ignore

1.1 What’s Really Happening in Xinjiang

Let’s talk about Xinjiang for a second. The Chinese government calls those detention centers “re-education camps.” Right. And I’m the Queen of England. We’re talking about over a million people—actual human beings—forced into labor, stripped of their culture, and watched 24/7 by facial recognition cameras. The UN’s called it out as potential genocide. But China? They just shrug and say it’s all “Western lies.” Convenient, huh?

1.2 Pakistan’s Free Pass on Terrorism

Now flip over to Pakistan. Groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba (the guys behind the 2008 Mumbai attacks) operate pretty openly there. Everyone knows it. But China? They keep blocking UN actions against these groups. Worse—they’re giving Pakistan military support and political cover. It’s like watching someone yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater while their buddy quietly hands out matches.

1.3 The Ugly Truth Behind the Double Standard

Here’s how it works: China cracks down in Xinjiang because they want those sweet, sweet trade routes and natural resources. No dissent allowed. But Pakistan? That’s their ticket to keeping India in check and expanding influence. Principles don’t enter into it. When terrorism suits their agenda, suddenly they develop selective hearing.

2. The Three Things That Keep Beijing Up at Night

2.1 Losing Xinjiang—And Face

Xinjiang’s always been a tinderbox. After the 2009 riots, China decided the solution was to erase Uyghur culture entirely. Because nothing says “stability” like a million people in camps, right? But honestly? They’re terrified of real rebellion. So they’ll keep crushing rights to avoid looking weak.

2.2 Pakistan Slipping Away

Let me put it this way—Pakistan is China’s golden goose. That $60 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor? It’s the crown jewel of their Belt and Road project. If Pakistan ever stopped playing nice, China’s whole South Asia strategy would collapse faster than a house of cards in a windstorm. So they’ll ignore the terrorism thing—infrastructure deals are more important than principles, apparently.

2.3 Becoming the World’s Villain

China hates criticism. Like, really hates it. So they do two things: First, they scream “Western interference!” anytime someone mentions human rights. Second, they use economic muscle to keep critics quiet. Countries dependent on Chinese trade suddenly develop amnesia about pesky things like genocide. Funny how that works.

3. Why This Silence Is Dangerous for Everyone

3.1 India-China Relations: A Lost Cause?

Every time China protects Pakistan, it’s basically giving India the middle finger. Border tensions? Check. Broken trust? Double check. At this point, it’s clear China values their proxy war more than actual peace.

3.2 The Global Counter-Terrorism Farce

Here’s the kicker—when a UN Security Council member openly shields terrorists, the whole system becomes a joke. If China won’t play by the rules, why should anyone else? It’s like having a firefighter who’s also an arsonist.

The Bottom Line

China’s silence on Pakistan screams three things loud and clear: They’re scared of losing Xinjiang, terrified of losing Pakistan, and paranoid about global criticism. Until the world calls them out on this nonsense, their hypocrisy will keep making the world more dangerous. And honestly? We’re all paying the price.

Source: Navbharat Times – Default

Exit mobile version