Site icon Pulsivic

Shock Rise: Sizewell C Nuclear Plant Now Costs £38bn – What Went Wrong?

Shock Rise Sizewell C Nuclear Plant Now Costs 38bn What 20250718210242380031

Sizewell C’s Sticker Shock: How a £38bn Nuclear Dream Got So Complicated

You know that feeling when you order a coffee and the bill comes back twice what you expected? That’s basically what just happened with the UK’s Sizewell C nuclear plant—except instead of a few extra quid, we’re talking about an eye-watering £38 billion price tag. And honestly? Nobody saw this coming. Or at least, not this bad.

How We Got Here: From Clean Energy Hope to Budget Nightmare

Let me take you back to when this whole thing started. Back then, Sizewell C was supposed to be Britain’s shiny new solution—clean energy, thousands of jobs, and less reliance on unpredictable gas imports. The original estimate? Around £20bn. Not exactly pocket change, but manageable for something this important.

Fast forward to today, and the numbers have practically doubled. So what gives? Well, it’s a perfect storm of problems:

The Real Kicker? This Isn’t Even That Surprising

Here’s the thing—anyone who’s followed big infrastructure projects could’ve seen some of this coming. Take Hinkley Point C, Sizewell’s older sibling. That project’s costs ballooned too. Or look at France’s Flamanville reactor—same story, different country.

But here’s where it gets interesting. While nuclear plants keep getting more expensive, the cost of renewables like wind and solar keeps dropping. Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

What People Are Saying (And Why They’re All Partly Right)

The experts are split, and honestly, they all make decent points:

So… Now What?

That’s the million-pound question. Or rather, the £38 billion one. The government insists we need Sizewell C for energy security. There’s talk about smaller, modular reactors that might be cheaper—but that tech’s still unproven at scale.

Meanwhile, the clock’s ticking on climate targets, and every delay makes nuclear look less attractive compared to faster-to-build alternatives. It’s a proper mess, if we’re being honest.

The Bottom Line

Here’s how I see it: Sizewell C has become a test case for whether big nuclear projects still make sense in today’s world. The costs are staggering, but so are the stakes. One thing’s for sure—whatever decision gets made now, we’ll be living with the consequences (and paying the bills) for decades to come.

Makes that overpriced coffee seem pretty trivial, doesn’t it?

Source: Financial Times – Companies

Exit mobile version