Site icon Pulsivic

US Strikes Iran’s Nuclear Sites – Owaisi Calls It Illegal. What Happens Next?

US Strikes Iran’s Nuclear Sites – Owaisi Calls It Illegal. What Happens Next?

US Bombs Iran’s Nuclear Sites – Owaisi Says It’s Illegal. Now What?

Okay, let’s break this down. The US just teamed up with Israel and dropped bombs on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities over the weekend. And yeah, it’s as messy as it sounds. US officials are calling it a “preventive measure”—you know, like when you take an umbrella because the sky looks sketchy. But Asaduddin Owaisi, the firebrand Indian politician, isn’t buying it. He’s straight-up called the attack illegal. So what does this mean for the Middle East, already a powder keg? Buckle up.

So What Actually Went Down?

The Attack: Minute by Minute (Sort Of)

Early Saturday morning—like, really early—US and Israeli jets hit nuclear sites in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. Iran’s government media says damage was “minor,” but let’s be real, they’d say that even if the place was a crater. The West? They’re claiming Iran was speeding up its nuke program. And honestly, after years of back-and-forth, I guess someone decided talking wasn’t cutting it.

Why Now?

Here’s the thing: the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA, if you love acronyms) has been dead for a while. Iran kept pushing limits, the US kept scowling, and Israel? They’ve been itching to act. “We can’t let Iran get nukes,” said some White House guy. But here’s the kicker—no one’s sure if Iran even wants a bomb or just likes everyone thinking they do. Classic Middle Eastern standoff.

Owaisi’s Take: “This Is Straight-Up Wrong”

The Man’s Got Opinions

Owaisi—never one to mince words—tweeted that the strikes were “illegal, immoral, and a violation of sovereignty.” And he’s not wrong about the sovereignty part. I mean, imagine if Iran bombed Texas because they didn’t like US policies. Yeah, not gonna fly.

But Is It Really Illegal?

International law is like that one friend who says “it’s complicated” when you ask a simple question. Article 2(4) of the UN Charter says no attacking other countries. But Article 51? That’s the “self-defense” loophole. Remember Iraq 2003? Everyone twisted the rules then too. Legal or not, it’s a bad look.

How’s the World Reacting?

Team US-Israel

The UK and Saudi Arabia are cheering this on. British PM called Iran’s nuke program an “existential threat”—big words for a country that once ruled half the world. Gulf states? They’re just happy someone’s standing up to Tehran.

Team “This Is Messed Up”

Russia, China, and South Africa are furious. Moscow’s calling it “aggression,” Beijing’s waving the “restraint” flag, and Iraq’s like, “Guys, we’re still rebuilding from the last war you started.”

What’s Next? (Spoiler: Nothing Good)

Iran’s Revenge Arc

Iran won’t just take this lying down. They’ve got proxies in Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon—you name it. Or they might go full missile strike. Either way, stock up on popcorn.

Oil Prices Are Having a Meltdown

Prices shot up 8% already. If this escalates, forget cheap gas. And global supply chains? They’ll be more tangled than earphones in your pocket.

Can Diplomacy Fix This?

The UN’s scrambling for emergency talks. Europe’s pleading for calm. But trust is deader than the JCPOA. So yeah, don’t hold your breath.

Bottom Line

We’re in uncharted waters here. The strikes might’ve delayed Iran’s nuke plans, but at what cost? Owaisi’s right—the legality’s shaky, and the fallout could be worse. Right now, the world’s just waiting to see if this blows over or blows up. And my gut says it’s not gonna be pretty.

Source: Hindustan Times – India News

Exit mobile version